|
Chapters
(Chap. 1)
Music and Politics
***************
(Chap. 2)
Out of the Bowels of Calypso
***************
(Chap. 3)
The Spectrum of Dynamisn
**************
(Chap. 4)
The Competition
***************
(Chap. 5)
Gospelypso as Culture
************
(Chap. 6)
Uses and Functions &
Summary of Conclusions |
continued from Chapter 5
USES AND FUNCTIONS
No discussion of this nature would be complete unless some mention is made
about Merriam's theory of the uses and functions of music. For a long time
ethnomusicologists
have done studies without making a distinction between
the uses and the functions of music. Such lack of distinction has led to
gross ambiguity and oversight of many relevant factors. According to
Merriam's theory separation of the uses from the functions of music
is
absolutely necessary. Through observation of the uses of music, the student
gains
direct insight into factual knowledge about that particular musical
form. However in
analyzing the functions of music, the student seeks to
increase factual knowledge
indirectly. Functions apply to the reasons for
its use and the broader purpose which it serves. He has gone on to suggest
some functions which are common to all music.
The following are the functions given by
Merriam;
1.The function of aesthetic enjoyment
2.The function of entertainment
3.The function of communication
4.The function of symbolic representation |
5.The function of physical response
6.The function of enforcing conformity to social norms
7.The function of validation of social institution and religious
rituals
8.The function of contribution to the continuity and stability of
the artform
9.The function of the contribution to the integration of society
[Merriam: 1964. 223]
For greater understanding of the artform, we shall examine these
functions as they relate to Gospelypso. First and foremost, we must
analyze the use of Gospelypso. Gospelypso is the medium used whereby
Christians can communicate the gospel to primarily Trinidadians, but
secondarily to anyone who would listen. In keeping with this idea,
Gospelypso is used in mostly evangelistic type meetings, (meetings
geared towards spreading the gospel). However in recent years,
Gospelypso has seen a revolution in its purpose. Primarily,
Gospelypso was composed for Non-Christians, hence the reason for its
preoccupation with "Salvation"- the "Rite of Passage" into
Christianity. A reason for this may very well be that Gospelypso was
not accepted by the Christian community, therefore they did not need
to communicate to the Christians. It is normal, that in any time
period there would be those who would be "ahead of their time", and
as such, songs with a variation of the theme may still be found.
However, essentially the theme of salvation was the primary theme.
The revolution which has come about now reflects on the fact that
Gospelypso has, to a certain extent, become accepted by the
Christians. Since they have already experienced salvation, it is
somewhat redundant to keep harping on that theme. Therefore, we have
seen an increase in the themes which are discussed in the Gospelypso.
Such themes include; explanation of what Gospelypso is, The defeat
of Satan, The Correct behaviour for a Christian Woman, Angels,
Heaven, Working for Jesus, The Bible, and The truths about the
Gospel of Jesus Christ. To what extent are Merriam's theories be
applicable to Gospelypsoes? It is when we consider these functions,
that the real value of the artform is underscored for us. Merriam
has suggested that music serves to enforce conformity to social
norms. With respect to this music, we can say that it enforces
conformity to religious norms. It beckons for one to adhere to the
principles laid down in the Bible. All of the functions suggested by
Merriam can apply to Gospelypso.
However, the functions which apply to the communication of the
gospel seem to come to the forefront, yet we must be careful not to
negate the fact that music can operate between two polarities, the
ideological and the sensory. Gospelypso has embrace both aspects.
There is a sensory side to the music, meaning that the music appeals
to the senses. The music must not be deemed sensual, as sensual
according to the Oxford dictionary, is “fleshy or carnal”. This idea
of carnality has been a major consideration in the acceptance or non
acceptance of the artform. Nevertheless, the music does evoke a
response. The Gospelypsonians are hoping that it will. It is a music
which seeks to affect both side of the polarity continuum. At many
gospel concerts where Gospelypso is performed, the member of the
audience who is unfamiliar with the performance practices of the
artform, and who are outside of the Christian community, may find
that the response of the congregation differs very slightly from the
audience at a calypso tent. When the lyrics call for laughter they
will laugh, when it calls for a specific physical response, such as
the stamping of the feet, as it does in the song "Jump for Jesus" or
"Mash Satan", they will do that also. When the lyrics call for an
introspective look at oneself, the gospelypsonian hopes that the
individual will do this also. ·
THE GOSPELYPSO TENT
At the present moment, there is no such institution as the
Gospelypso tent. Whereas Gospelypso is a subset of calypso, it has
maintained its peculiarities in that it has chosen to exclude some
aspects which are common to calypso from its performance practices.
"The Tent is atmosphere, and the atmosphere is one of 'laisser
faire' or heckling. Calypsonians evolved their own brand of dress.
The crucial link between the audience and Calypsonian is the MC,
[Master of Ceremonies]. He puts the audience in the proper frame of
mind with a blend of verbal acrobatics, jokes and heckling".
[Warner; 1982, 7]. Using this description to form a comparison
between the calypso tent and the Gospelypso competition, we can
observe several similarities and differences. The fact that the
stress is more on the ideological that the sensory is enough to
explain the exclusions. The actions which are performed in keeping
with the sensory are kept to a minimum, and includes the heckling
and the brand of dress. Nevertheless the Master of Ceremonies is
still the link between the audience and the performers. His task is
one of introducing the artist, "stalling", giving jokes in the
intervals, and announcing the winners.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Using the theoretical concepts put forward by theorists of various
disciplines, including Ethnomusicology, Religion, Folklore and
Anthropology, a framework was set for the study of Gospelypso.
As we have seen, Gospelypso is a subset of Calypso, which in itself
continues to go through its evolutionary stages, as does Gospelypso.
We have been able to examine various facets of the artform including
the social history which prompted its evolution, how it is used and
how it functions in society, the competition and the repertoires. An
effort has been made towards an understanding of the trends of
society which have concluded in its acceptance on the one hand and
its non acceptance on the other.
Gospelypso can and should be used as a dominant symbol in the
community; a symbol of culture and a symbol of religion. Like
calypso, it will continue to brave the storms of people’s opinions,
firmly anchored in the strength of a people and their culture.
(No reproduction of this material is to
be made for profit or distributed
without the expressed permission of the author)
|
AAyoung,
Selwyn.
|
“Soca
Fever”
(Unpublished
thesis)Indiana
University,
1981
|
|
Bilby,
Kenneth.
|
The
Caribbean as
a Musical
Region.
The
Woodrow
Wilson
International
Centre for
Scholars.
Washington
D.C.1985.
|
|
Blacking,
John.
|
How
musical is
man?
University
of
Washington
press 1973.
|
|
Dawson,
Christopher.
|
Religion and
Culture: The
Glifford
Lectures.
Meridian
Books Inc.
London 1975.
|
|
Gibaldi,
Joseph and
Walter S.
Achlot.
|
MLA
Handbook For
Writers of
Research
Papers,
Theses and
Dissertations.
(Student
Edition);
Modern
Language
Association.
New York
1980.
|
|
Gospelypso
|
A
Profile.
(Undated)
|
|
Herskovits,
Melville.
|
Cultural
Dynamics.
Alfred
A. Knoph.
New York.
1966
|
|
Merriam,
Alan.
|
The
Anthropology
of Music.
Northwestern
University
Press. 1964.
|
|
Murray,
John.
|
Primitive
Culture.
1871 Rpt
New
York: Harper
Torchbooks,
Harper and
Row. 1958.
|
|
Nettl.
Bruno.
|
The
Study of
Ethnomusicology:
29 Issues
and
Concepts.
University
of Illinois,
Press London
1930.
|
|
Radocy,
Rudolf E.
and J. David
Boyle.
|
Psychological
Foundations
of Musical
Behavior.
Charles C.
Thomas.
Illinois.
1979.
|
|
Roberts,
John Storm.
|
Black
Music of Two
Worlds.
William
Morrow and
Company,
Inc. New
York, 1974.
|
|
Schreiter,
Robert J.
|
Constructing
Local
Theologies.
Orbis
Books New
York. 1985.
|
|
Spradley,
James and
David W.
McCurdy.
|
Anthropology:
The Cultural
Perspective.
John
Wiley and
Sons Inc.
London,
1975.
|
|
Todditon,
Jeff., James
T. Koetting,
David P.
McAllester,
David B.
Reck and
Mark Slobin
|
Worlds
of Music.
McMillan
Publishers,
London.
1984.
|
|
Warner,
Keith Q.
|
The
Trinidad
Calypso: A
study of the
Calypso as
Oral
Literature.
Heineman Ed.
Books Ltd.
London,
1982.
|
End of Thesis
|
|
|
|
|